Screener
FLGB vs FLCH
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF vs Franklin FTSE China ETF
Key differences
- FLGB costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLGB is significantly larger than FLCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLGB covers europe markets; FLCH covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, FLGB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLGB | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $855M | $282M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.27% | 2.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.2% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.4% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.0% | -4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.13% | 19.12% |
| Max drawdown | -42.61% | -62.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLGB and FLCH
Explore further