Screener
FLCH vs FLAU
Franklin FTSE China ETF vs Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Key differences
- FLAU costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLCH is significantly larger than FLAU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLCH covers emerging markets markets; FLAU covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLCH | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $282M | $93M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.47% | 2.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.2% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.12% | 16.64% |
| Max drawdown | -62.09% | -45.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLCH and FLAU
Explore further