Screener
FLJP vs DBJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
Key differences
- FLJP costs 0.36% less per year.
- FLJP is significantly larger than DBJP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, DBJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DBJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLJP | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $613M |
| Since | 2017 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 4.66% | 2.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.3% | +52.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.6% | +21.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.13% | 19.06% |
| Max drawdown | -32.49% | -31.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLJP and DBJP
Explore further