Screener
FLQL vs AFSM
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQL costs 0.60% less per year.
- FLQL is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQL follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FLQL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQL | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $94M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.99% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -33.64% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQL and AFSM
Explore further