Screener
FLQM vs AFLG
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQM costs 0.25% less per year.
- FLQM follows a index tracking strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQM | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $609M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.51% | 0.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -35.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQM and AFLG
Explore further