Screener
FLQM vs AFMC
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQM costs 0.38% less per year.
- FLQM is significantly larger than AFMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQM follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQM | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $153M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.51% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.8% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.36% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQM and AFMC
Explore further