Screener
FLQS vs AFSM
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQS costs 0.40% less per year.
- FLQS follows a index tracking strategy; AFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQS | AFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $94M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | 17.84% |
| Max drawdown | -42.16% | -43.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQS and AFSM
Explore further