Screener
FLRG vs DEEF
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.09% less per year.
- FLRG is significantly larger than DEEF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRG covers north america markets; DEEF covers global.
- FLRG follows a index tracking strategy; DEEF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, FLRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DEEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | DEEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $55M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 3.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +25.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 13.59% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -36.47% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and DEEF
Explore further