Screener
FLRG vs RODM
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.14% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than FLRG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRG covers north america markets; RODM covers global.
- FLRG follows a index tracking strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
- RODM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and RODM
Explore further