Screener
FLRG vs ROSC
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.19% less per year.
- FLRG is significantly larger than ROSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FLRG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ROSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRG | ROSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $283M | $55M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 1.87% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.4% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.28% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -19.64% | -43.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRG and ROSC
Explore further