Screener
FLRN vs TFLR
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF vs T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
Key differences
- FLRN costs 0.46% less per year.
- FLRN is significantly larger than TFLR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLRN covers north america markets; TFLR covers global.
- FLRN follows a index tracking strategy; TFLR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TFLR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FLRN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLRN | TFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $569M |
| Since | 2011 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | 6.85% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.7% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.62 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.68% | 1.98% |
| Max drawdown | -14.64% | -4.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLRN and TFLR
Explore further