Screener
TFLR vs BRLN
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF vs iShares Floating Rate Loan Active ETF
Key differences
- BRLN costs 0.06% less per year.
- TFLR is significantly larger than BRLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TFLR covers global markets; BRLN covers north america.
- TFLR follows a active selection strategy; BRLN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| TFLR | BRLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $569M | $54M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.85% | 6.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.98% | 3.03% |
| Max drawdown | -4.01% | -3.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TFLR and BRLN
Explore further