Screener
FLUD vs SCUB
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
Both FLUD and SCUB are fixed income ETFs. FLUD charges 0.15% a year and SCUB 0.30%. The main difference: FLUD follows a index tracking strategy; SCUB uses active selection.
- FLUD follows a index tracking strategy; SCUB uses active selection.
- FLUD costs 0.15% less per year.
- FLUD is much larger than SCUB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SCUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLUD | SCUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $395M | $25M |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.35% | 3.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.67% | -0.16% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.