Screener
FLV vs ACSV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.07% less per year.
- FLV is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | ACSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $12M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -7.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLV and ACSV
Explore further