Screener
FLV vs OALC
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.07% less per year.
- FLV follows a active selection strategy; OALC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, OALC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | OALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $220M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.8% | +34.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.08% | 13.05% |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -26.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLV and OALC
Explore further