Screener
FLV vs OASC
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.27% less per year.
- FLV is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLV follows a active selection strategy; OASC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $78M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.8% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.08% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -26.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLV and OASC
Explore further