Screener
FLV vs QGRO
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- QGRO costs 0.13% less per year.
- QGRO is significantly larger than FLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLV follows a active selection strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLV | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.42% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.7% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.09% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -15.06% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLV and QGRO
Explore further