Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FLXR vs FORH

TCW Flexible Income ETF vs Formidable ETF

FLXR

TCW Flexible Income ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$3.2B

FORH

Formidable ETF

Annual cost

1.19%

Fund size

$20M

Key differences

FLXR is a fixed income ETF, while FORH is an alternative ETF. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and FORH 1.19%.

  • FLXR is a fixed income fund, while FORH is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • FLXR follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
  • FLXR costs 0.79% less per year.
  • FLXR is much larger than FORH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

FLXRFORH
Annual cost (TER)0.40%1.19%
Fund size (AUM)$3.2B$20M
Since20182021
Dividend yield5.71%1.73%
Asset classfixed incomealternative
Regionglobal
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+5.5%+10.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.13
Volatility 1Y2.28%16.00%
Max drawdown-1.94%-20.73%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FLXR and FORH