Screener
FLXR vs KAT
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- FLXR costs 0.35% less per year.
- FLXR is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLXR is classified as mixed asset, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $688M |
| Since | 2018 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 5.66% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -9.25% |
Similar to FLXR and KAT
Explore further