Screener
FLXR vs SLNZ
TCW Flexible Income ETF vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
Both FLXR and SLNZ are fixed income ETFs. FLXR charges 0.40% a year and SLNZ 0.65%. The main difference: FLXR covers global markets; SLNZ covers North America.
- FLXR covers global markets; SLNZ covers North America.
- FLXR costs 0.25% less per year.
- FLXR is much larger than SLNZ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SLNZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLXR | SLNZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.2B | $226M |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.71% | 7.50% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.27% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -1.94% | -2.57% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.