Screener
FMAT vs MXI
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs iShares Global Materials ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.31% less per year.
- FMAT covers north america markets; MXI covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, MXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMAT | MXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.08% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $603M | $325M |
| Since | 2013 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +31.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 19.38% |
| Max drawdown | -41.11% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMAT and MXI
Explore further