Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MXI vs PICK

iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF

MXI

iShares Global Materials ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$325M

PICK

iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.9B

Key differences

  • PICK is significantly larger than MXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, PICK has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MXIPICK
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$325M$1.9B
Since20062012
Dividend yield1.78%2.40%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.6%+79.9%
CAGR 3Y+13.3%+20.7%
CAGR 5Y+5.8%+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.580.72
Volatility 1Y19.38%27.61%
Max drawdown-39.52%-52.73%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MXI and PICK