Screener
FMCX vs GLOF
FM Focus Equity ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- GLOF costs 0.51% less per year.
- FMCX follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMCX | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $196M |
| Since | 2022 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 1.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.7% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 12.58% |
| Max drawdown | -17.70% | -34.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMCX and GLOF
Explore further