Screener
FMCX vs HQGO
FM Focus Equity ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- HQGO costs 0.37% less per year.
- FMCX follows a active selection strategy; HQGO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMCX | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $115M | $48M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.95% | 13.45% |
| Max drawdown | -17.70% | -20.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMCX and HQGO
Explore further