Screener
FMCX vs IWN
FM Focus Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
Both FMCX and IWN are equity ETFs. FMCX charges 0.71% a year and IWN 0.24%. The main difference: FMCX follows a active selection strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- FMCX follows a active selection strategy; IWN uses index tracking.
- IWN costs 0.47% less per year.
- IWN is much larger than FMCX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMCX | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.1% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.8% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.13% | 18.09% |
| Max drawdown | -17.70% | -46.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.