Screener
FMET vs FMAT
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.31% less per year.
- FMAT is significantly larger than FMET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FMET has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMET | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $603M |
| Since | 2022 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.55% | 17.76% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMET and FMAT
Explore further