Screener
FMKT vs NLR
The Free Markets ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.24% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than FMKT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMKT follows a active selection strategy; NLR uses index tracking.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FMKT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 41.97% |
| Max drawdown | -17.79% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FMKT and NLR
Explore further