Screener
FNDC vs IWN
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWN costs 0.15% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than FNDC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDC | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2013 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.24% | 17.87% |
| Max drawdown | -43.22% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDC and IWN
Explore further