Screener
FNDC vs IWD
Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Key differences
- IWD costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWD is significantly larger than FNDC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDC | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $74.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.48% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.24% | 10.88% |
| Max drawdown | -43.22% | -38.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDC and IWD
Explore further