Screener
FNDF vs KAT
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.50% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDF follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDF | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $688M |
| Since | 2013 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.14% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDF and KAT
Explore further