Screener
FNDF vs PY
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.10% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than PY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNDF covers global ex us markets; PY covers north america.
- FNDF follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNDF | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $23.1B | $212M |
| Since | 2013 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.03% | 10.74% |
| Max drawdown | -40.14% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNDF and PY
Explore further