Screener
FNY vs ACSG
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.24% less per year.
- FNY is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNY follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
- FNY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FNY | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.73% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $518M | $15M |
| Since | 2011 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.03% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.81% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.91% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FNY and ACSG
Explore further