Screener
FORH vs AFMC
Formidable ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFMC costs 0.51% less per year.
- AFMC is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while AFMC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $153M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and AFMC
Explore further