Screener
FORH vs AFLG
Formidable ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- AFLG costs 0.64% less per year.
- AFLG is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while AFLG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $609M |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -35.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and AFLG
Explore further