Skip to content
Screener

FORH vs BINC

Formidable ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

FORH

Formidable ETF

Annual cost

1.19%

Fund size

$20M

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$16.8B

Key differences

FORH is an alternative ETF, while BINC is a fixed income ETF. FORH charges 1.19% a year and BINC 0.40%.

  • FORH is an alternative fund, while BINC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • FORH follows a option income strategy; BINC uses active selection.
  • BINC costs 0.79% less per year.
  • BINC is much larger than FORH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BINC has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

FORHBINC
Annual cost (TER)1.19%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$20M$16.8B
Since20212023
Dividend yield1.73%5.54%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Region
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+10.3%+5.5%
CAGR 3Y+3.6%+6.9%
CAGR 5Y+0.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.071.06
Volatility 1Y15.96%2.28%
Max drawdown-20.73%-2.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to FORH and BINC