Screener
FORH vs BTR
Formidable ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- BTR costs 0.11% less per year.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; BTR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $37M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and BTR
Explore further