Screener
BTR vs SPDF
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.39% less per year.
- BTR is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BTR is classified as mixed asset, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTR | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $5M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.77% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.67% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTR and SPDF
Explore further