Screener
FORH vs DYNF
Formidable ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.93% less per year.
- DYNF is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while DYNF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; DYNF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DYNF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | DYNF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $34.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +31.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | +15.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.08 | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.66% | 12.60% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -34.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and DYNF
Explore further