Screener
DYNF vs BFLX
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- DYNF costs 0.14% less per year.
- DYNF covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- DYNF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYNF | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34.0B | — |
| Since | 2019 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.41 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.60% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.72% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DYNF and BFLX
Explore further