Screener
FORH vs GINN
Formidable ETF vs Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.69% less per year.
- GINN is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FORH is classified as alternative, while GINN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FORH follows a option income strategy; GINN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FORH | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $206M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 16.09% |
| Max drawdown | -20.73% | -41.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FORH and GINN
Explore further