Screener
FOTO vs SMH
Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Key differences
- FOTO follows a active selection strategy; SMH uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FOTO | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $58.8B |
| Since | — | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +147.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +66.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +39.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 30.41% |
| Max drawdown | — | -45.30% |
Similar to FOTO and SMH
Explore further