Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FPX vs FSGS

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

FPX

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF

First Trust

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$1.3B

FSGS

First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

First Trust

Annual cost

0.61%

Fund size

$29M

Key differences

  • FPX is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, FPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FPXFSGS
Annual cost (TER)0.57%0.61%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$29M
Since20062017
Dividend yield0.52%0.00%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+43.6%+6.0%
CAGR 3Y+32.8%+8.3%
CAGR 5Y+11.1%+2.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.080.33
Volatility 1Y23.17%15.30%
Max drawdown-43.14%-43.25%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FPX and FSGS