Screener
FPX vs LMBS
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- FPX costs 0.09% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than FPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FPX is classified as equity, while LMBS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPX | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $6.2B |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 4.09% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.6% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.8% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | 1.96% |
| Max drawdown | -43.14% | -6.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FPX and LMBS
Explore further