Screener
FPX vs XNAV
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- FPX costs 0.70% less per year.
- FPX is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FPX is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- FPX follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FPX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $31M |
| Since | 2006 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.6% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.8% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -43.14% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FPX and XNAV
Explore further