Screener
FQAL vs FMCX
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs FM Focus Equity ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.56% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than FMCX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FQAL follows a index tracking strategy; FMCX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FQAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FQAL | FMCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $115M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 12.95% |
| Max drawdown | -33.71% | -17.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FQAL and FMCX
Explore further