Screener
FQAL vs ROE
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.34% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than ROE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FQAL follows a index tracking strategy; ROE uses active selection.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FQAL | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $239M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +37.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -33.71% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FQAL and ROE
Explore further