Screener
FQAL vs GQQQ
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.20% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than GQQQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FQAL follows a index tracking strategy; GQQQ uses active selection.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FQAL | GQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $130M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +43.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.32% | 15.78% |
| Max drawdown | -33.71% | -22.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FQAL and GQQQ
Explore further