Screener
FSCS vs BCSM
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF vs Baron SMID Cap ETF
Key differences
- FSCS costs 0.15% less per year.
- FSCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSCS | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $29M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.01% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.57% | -17.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSCS and BCSM
Explore further