Screener
FSCS vs EPSV
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF vs Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FSCS costs 0.28% less per year.
- FSCS is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FSCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSCS | EPSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $5M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.01% | 17.79% |
| Max drawdown | -43.57% | -8.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSCS and EPSV
Explore further