Screener
FSCS vs XMHQ
First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
Both FSCS and XMHQ are equity ETFs. FSCS charges 0.60% a year and XMHQ 0.25%. The main difference: XMHQ costs 0.35% less per year.
- XMHQ costs 0.35% less per year.
- XMHQ is much larger than FSCS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XMHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSCS | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $56M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.3% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +15.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.45 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.82% | 15.78% |
| Max drawdown | -43.57% | -36.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.